Natasha Avps,llc Canoga Park, Ca
Canoga Park,#2UPDATE Employee
Sat, December 27, 2008
Merchant was approved 12/7/07. We were unable to get any connect with the merchant until 6/13/08. Merchant ran his transactions as follows; First transactions 6/20/08, failed. Second transaction processed 6/20/08 but was returned 6/25/08 by check writer. Third transaction 6/26/08 failed. Fourth transaction 7/11/08 failed. Fifth transaction was processed 08/6/08 is the transaction in question, in the amount of $1,675.00. The transaction settled at the bank on 8/12/08, which is 4 business days from the time the transaction was processed. An email was sent to Mr. J, 8/13/08, 8/18/08, and 8/19/08 to the email address on file for him of [email protected]. The first response to the emails from Teri was on 8/25/08 from the email address of [email protected]. Teri then requested documentation on the transaction in question. Email sent 08/13/08 clearly states that the signed ACH Authorization form from Christopher McMath was requested. We received an email that the check writer sent to [email protected] from a yahoo account. No contact information for the check writer that was valid. Phone number no good and email address unverifiable. There was also an email stating that the check writer was currently serving in Iraq and could not be contacted through any other method than email. In the interim of the transaction and the request and verification of supporting documentation, Mr. J rejected a .35 cent transaction fee on 8/15/08. He was advised of this and stated, He had a chargeback issue with another merchant service provider and had no money in his account. He expected to have that cleared up by the end of the week. This email was sent Aug. 27, 2008. The rejected amount of .35 cents was processed again and returned again on Sept. 10, 2008. In light of the merchant's previous failed transactions, rejection of small transaction fees, admittance of chargeback issues with another processor, inability to provide documentation with signatures from the check writer, (which is a requirement of NACHA) and the merchant's credit score, AVPS was not in a position to release any funds. AVPS has full right to hold funds as stated in the contract signed by Mr. J. Section 6 subsection (b) AVPS may withhold payment to Merchant for any of the following reasons: 1) AVPS is suspicious of any transactions. AVPS has been in contact with Mr. McMath's representative and are working on a resolution to refund the amount to his checking account. It would also be of interest to those reading this report to refer to Drero on this same site.