Robert
Irvine,#2Consumer Comment
Thu, March 31, 2011
It is about the cable TV service providers forcing rented cable-boxes and/or rented DVR recording devices, on customers that should not need the cost and inconvenience.
- Interesting I have Digital Cable and have it connected directly to a couple of TV's.
I also have NEVER been forced to rent a DVR. Now I do have one but that is because I want one...not because they said I had to have one.
Inspector
Tobyhanna,#3Consumer Comment
Thu, March 31, 2011
Don't have that problem here, no box just a cable. Digital cable and no change in channel line up.
Dennis
Grove City,#4Author of original report
Thu, March 31, 2011
I have noted that the responses in this thread are not relevant to the original post. The core issue of the original post only addresses one area of concern about cable TV service providers. The complaint is on behalf of those who subscribe to a typical, coaxial, cable TV service. It concerns people that only want to receive what has usually been described as a 70 channel basic cable package.
This is not to be confused with persons that want interactive cable TV services with HBO, on demand programming, pay-per-view movies, etc. Neither is it to be confused with satellite TV or Internet/phone line TV services. Most importantly, this is not at all about reverting to old
technology or converting modern digital TV signals for use on older style televisions with analog tuners. Likewise, one should not confuse, antenna type, over-the-air, set-top, digital-to-analog, converter boxes, with "set-top-cable-TV-boxes.
The original complaint is only about those with modern televisions, with high-definition, digital tuners. It is about cable TV service providers requiring a cable-box to be used on televisions that already contain the internal technology not to need one. It is about the cable TV service providers forcing rented cable-boxes and/or rented DVR recording devices, on customers that should not need the cost and inconvenience.
The confusion evidenced in these responses helps to make the point of the original complaint. That is that cable TV service providers have done an excellent job of misinforming and confusing the public about what is needed to receive basic cable TV services.
mr. rik
miami,#5Consumer Suggestion
Thu, March 31, 2011
Theres not much of a way around it, unless you wanna get real technical and illegal.
A late night mission with a pair of cable cutters might make you feel better though.
Then you can always "wait" for the repair van to arrive.
tigersy2k3
United States of America#6Consumer Comment
Wed, March 30, 2011
So you seriously are trying to claim technology advances have nothing to do with the need of a box top for your cable. When is the last time you saw an HDMI cable ran from your cable provider? Never, thats when. Coaxial cable carries signals but as you go from 480 to 720 to 1080 you have to enhance the picture somehow. I bet you were up in arms too when OTA went from analog to digital too and you had to buy a $10 box (with federal assistance) to get free channels.. Oh my, a one time $10 payment per TV for a lifetime of free television.
Please this is a hoax and a waste of time to read.
Why doesnt my typewriter work with my computer?? I mean after all the keys are the same and the letters of the alphabet didnt change. This too must be a ploy by the computer industry to make you buy one of those super high tech keyboards when you already have a perfectly good working typewriter at home with the same keys
Robert
Buffalo,#7Consumer Comment
Wed, March 30, 2011
I'm shocked that you're only upset with cable systems and didn't mention the similar scheme used by satellite broadcasters. If it's good enough for the likes of DirecTV and Dish, why isn't it OK for a cable system?
Additionally, many of the DBS installations on the street where I live are NOT installed IAW the NEC!!! Can't say the same for the cable installations-at least they appear to be properly grounded. To throw some salt on the wound, if the DBS fails and the consumer isn't paying the 6 buck "insurance", the consumer is hit with a HIGH service charge for a tech to show up with a replacement LNB or DBS receiver. If you ask me, that's the REAL SCAM folks should be upset about. An ungrounded DBS antenna system is asking for the LNB or receiver to fail from either static or nearby lightning.
Over a year ago, I performed a survey of the DBS installations on my street, and ONLY ONE DBS installation (of the 9 I inspected) was grounded-the others were not!
But hey, here in NY the DBS industry is NOT REGULATED. I'm working with a few politicians in Albany to get that changed, but the DBS lobbying is almost impossible to overcome.
Go figure.