Michael J. Latham
San Diego,#2Consumer Suggestion
Thu, April 22, 2004
Who am I? A prior graduate of I.T.T. Technical Institute. Graduated in 2000, Computer Aided Design. Are they overpriced? Do they pressure people to join? Are they really using the latest technology? Are they a rip-off? Bear with me a second, and you can answer yourself. I went to ITT knowing full well a couple of things: 1. They are not a charity. They are a for-profit company. (Want your degree free? Don't plan on getting a good job with a free degree.) I was charged $30.00 for a book with the price, $12.99, on the back cover. At first, I was hot. Went and complained. (They refunded not only mine, but my entire classes over-charge) Only by putting 2 of my kids through State college did I find out my overcharge was pretty lame - I save over 60% (!!!) by shopping at a college book store off campus. And the 60% is on a new book, not used! Used, you save even more! Please, remember, somebody has to pay for the books, to store the books, hand out the books, keep an inventory of the books, etc, etc. And no, they don't do it for free. You can, however, go to a college book store off campus, on your own gas and get what you need. Since all they do is books, not education, they can sell cheap. Don't expect a good seafood dinner at a fast food restaurant. Just something as close as they can get! 2. Some instructors would suck, others would shine. (Kind of like every workplace in the world - some workers stand out as great, others not so.) Some would not even know as much as I did in some subjects. 3. I would have to go through a significant amount of training that seemed like I didn't really need - Remember your high school days? Why learn History? I'm not going to use that later in life.... Yeah, well, If you are so smart, why are you here? And nobody, once grown, still thinks what a waste of time in my school years, learning history. You get, hopefully, smarter. 4. Being For-profit, means, hopefully, The folks teaching are the best they can get, but the folks doing your ancillary stuff (Paper work, forms, etc), are where they skip to the less than stellar employees. 5. Whatever salary guidelines offered would be just that - A (rough) guideline. For the record, I graduated with a 3.9, and got a job paying the max end of the scale. Lucky? No, skilled. There is a big difference. That, plus the degree. More on that later.... 6. I would only get out what I put in. And that applies to many things. A good teacher can generate stupid students just like an idiot can generate skilled ones. The biggest irony of it all? I found two interesting groups - one, at school, planned on just sticking it out until they learned AutoCad (that cost them about 10 grand at ITT, however, it's about 300 - 1,000 for specific training in just Autocad someplace else.) They didn't need to waste time getting that little piece of paper. The second group, was at work. They where wishing they had stuck with it. Particularly when I got a raise over those who where there longer, because I had that little piece of paper, plus was good at the job. What about the latest technology? I learned on Autocad version 14, while the next release (Autocad 2000) was out on the streets. Perhaps they should have started us from day one again, so we could use that latest version? Please. If you are inclined to learn as much as you can, a newer version of software should be no problem. And hey, if they run the school around the release dates of newer software, count me out. What, a 5 month associate degree? Come on. Get real. Most education is done on principles of application, not specific software. I could learn Microstation, (competes with Autocad) if I had to. The principles of drafting would still apply. Thanks for the forum. (And no, I don't work at or for ITT. But my degree from them is working for me.)