Kenneth Shank
Glen Burnie,#2Consumer Comment
Sun, March 06, 2011
Hello,
So this morning my wife said she needed an oil change so I googled coupons for an oil change and somehow I ended up on this site reading the report by Ms Charlotte Watkins. I also read the rebuttal but the Glen Burnie Jiffy Lube. Well, I figured I would just update everyone as to how Ms Watkins fared in court, so you can decide for yourself whether or not you would like to use Jiffy Lube in Glen Burnie.
DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND
Case Information
Court System:DISTRICT COURT FOR
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY -
CIVIL SYSTEM
Case Number:070200098882008Claim Type:TORT
District/Location Codes:07 / 02Filing Date:07/14/2008Case Status:ACTIVE
Complaint, Judgment, and Related Persons Information
(Each Complaint, Hearing, Judgment is listed separately, along with each Related Person)
Complaint Information
Complaint No:001(WATKINS, CHARLOTTE) Vs:(JIFFY LUBE #1468 )
Type:REGULAR CLAIM
Complaint Status:JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF ENTERED
Status Date:03/24/2009Filing Date:07/14/2008Amount$5000Last Activity Date:03/24/2009
_______________________________________________________________________________
Hey Jiffy Lube Owners? Why didn't you update us on the status on this case like you said you would in the rebuttal? Oh yeah, that's right because you guys lost the case, dishonesty doesn't go anywhere when you hide something. You couldve easily posted the results and saved some of your customer base but the fact you hid it from the public means you are guilty of her report!
To sum it up, the great courts of A.A. Co. ruled in favor of the plaintiff for $5000. If the courts have ruled in this decision, basically means the rebuttal of the Owner/Manager of Jiffy Lube was 100% dishonest and a lie. These people obviously ran a scam on several people and these victims had high repair bills so Jiffy Lube could save $20? Well, I hate reading about these cases and it is ridiculous that this has happened. Neighborhood companies victimizing innocent people out of their hard earned money. James A Booker should be stripped of his rights to run a legitimate business in our County, and if Jiffy Lube had any public relations department, they should force him to sell his franchise for tarnishing the brand that Jiffy Lube has.
I do not know Charlotte Watkins & I am not a disgruntled customer of Jiffy Lube, I don't even go there because they are overpriced. But reading this story and doing a little bit of research frustrated me enough about this company to post this! Also, I would like to note that if James A Booker, his son, and the rest of his cronies had done the right thing in the first place, they wouldnt have to pay out this money now! Serves these crooks right!
To lookup the Public Information Online in regards to this case, goto:
http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/inquiry/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=070200098882008&loc=28&detailLoc=DSCIVIL
Jay
Glen Burnie,#3REBUTTAL Owner of company
Sat, November 29, 2008
I have been in contact with Ms. W and explained to her the reason for the delay was that I was trying to review the video surveillance from the day of service. Our DVR was damaged and it was taking longer than expected to review the video. Also wanted to note that the mechanic the car was towed to stated to my Manager and I that the car was about 1 to 2 quarts low on oil. I explained to Ms. W that this amount of oil burn off is not unusual given the circumstances and that would not cause a motor to fail. I also explained to Ms. W that this motor was used (Ms. W's mechanic told me he put a used motor in the car some time ago) and there is no way to tell what type of internal condition the motor was in. I further explained that it is impossibel for another shop to determine the condition of a motor from just a visual inspection. When I finally was able to review the video from our service it was absolutely clear that our technician added the correct amount of oil to the car. After the car was started he verified the oil light was off and again verified the oil level was full as per our procedures before the vehicle left our shop. Also note that there is clear communication between the technicians as to when the vehicle is ready for oil and when oil is being added to the vehicle. The Jiffy Lube invoice also states that 5 quarts of oil were added which is exactly how much oil the vehicle takes. I contacted Ms. W and explained that I would be happy to share the video with her so that she could see it for her self. I explained to Ms. W that it is unfortunate that this happened, but clearly we did not cause the problem. I called Ms. W back on Monday June 30 so that we could meet at my office to review the video together. Ms. Watkins stated that she was waiting for a co-worker and that she would call me when she was on the way over. I waited until 3 pm at the office, but Ms. W never did call me. I again called before I left the office for the day and left her a message for her to call at her convenience if there was anything else I could help her with. Since our last telephone conversation Ms. W has filed several complaints and done everything possible to tarnish our reputation in the community. Our company has been an accredited memeber of the BBB since 07/23/2004 and we are in good standings with the BBB. Ms. W has filed a civil suit against our company and given these circumstances we have chose to defend our case in court. I will update you with the results.