LP
Hazel Grove,#2UPDATE Employee
Mon, January 07, 2013
The person who wrote the report says that they believe the diary is not circulated, this is not true and if the they had telephoned the Police Federation which they did have the contact details for
they would have confirmed that the diaries are produced and circulated.
When the agent called he discussed the diary with the person and explained the agreement, he never said
that someone would telephone them regarding the advert. A proof was sent to the person asking them for updated copy which they did not give us.
The accusation that the signature was superimposed on the the Advertising Contract is quite frankly ludicrous as the person who wrote this report also filled in a large part of the Advertisement Contract. We are not a scam company or produce anything fraudulently.
Finally the person mentions about going to court and that the Judge was on our side. The Judge had the statements and facts from both parties and was impartial to both parties but found in our favour because
of the accuracy of our evidence and because of the inaccuracies in this persons case, who clearly told some untruths which were completely refutable. If the Judge had thought we were at fault he would have found in favour of the person that wrote the report, he did not!