Robert
Rochester,#2Consumer Comment
Fri, November 14, 2008
More than likely, in the contract you signed for the CC, you agreed to pay "reasonable attorney fees". The court ruled in Spear v. Brennan (Brennan was a lawyer suing Spears for a debt, Spears lost and appealed the ruling): Contrary to Spears' apparent position, Brennan was not prohibited as a matter of law from seeking a contingent fee, but he was required to present other objective evidence of reasonableness in order for the attorney's fees to be added to the judgment against Spears. LP&N can demand all they want, but they have to show that the amount is "reasonable." Your attorney should be aware of this ruling...
Robert
Rochester,#3Consumer Comment
Fri, November 14, 2008
More than likely, in the contract you signed for the CC, you agreed to pay "reasonable attorney fees". The court ruled in Spear v. Brennan (Brennan was a lawyer suing Spears for a debt, Spears lost and appealed the ruling): Contrary to Spears' apparent position, Brennan was not prohibited as a matter of law from seeking a contingent fee, but he was required to present other objective evidence of reasonableness in order for the attorney's fees to be added to the judgment against Spears. LP&N can demand all they want, but they have to show that the amount is "reasonable." Your attorney should be aware of this ruling...
Robert
Rochester,#4Consumer Comment
Fri, November 14, 2008
More than likely, in the contract you signed for the CC, you agreed to pay "reasonable attorney fees". The court ruled in Spear v. Brennan (Brennan was a lawyer suing Spears for a debt, Spears lost and appealed the ruling): Contrary to Spears' apparent position, Brennan was not prohibited as a matter of law from seeking a contingent fee, but he was required to present other objective evidence of reasonableness in order for the attorney's fees to be added to the judgment against Spears. LP&N can demand all they want, but they have to show that the amount is "reasonable." Your attorney should be aware of this ruling...
Robert
Rochester,#5Consumer Comment
Fri, November 14, 2008
More than likely, in the contract you signed for the CC, you agreed to pay "reasonable attorney fees". The court ruled in Spear v. Brennan (Brennan was a lawyer suing Spears for a debt, Spears lost and appealed the ruling): Contrary to Spears' apparent position, Brennan was not prohibited as a matter of law from seeking a contingent fee, but he was required to present other objective evidence of reasonableness in order for the attorney's fees to be added to the judgment against Spears. LP&N can demand all they want, but they have to show that the amount is "reasonable." Your attorney should be aware of this ruling...
Laurie
Haslet,#6Consumer Comment
Fri, November 14, 2008
GO TO www.budhibbs.com Consumer Advocate website that specializes in Collection Agencies and they havbe a list the absolute worst - Midland /Love Beal & Nixon are the listed as one of the WORST. Collection Agencies do not want you to know about this site because it exposes the nasty illegal tricks they use against you. Forget Class actions - you can sue Collection Agencies for violating Fair Debt Collection Practices Act