Flynrider
Phoenix,#2Consumer Comment
Mon, January 30, 2012
" MB has not produced a properly or legally executed copy of the contract and I don't have an executed copy. "
They are not required to produce anything. You are making the claim that they owe you a refund. You're basing this claim on what? If you don't have a copy of the terms and conditions of this warranty (which you should have), one would have to assume that you are guessing as to what it actually reads.
It is not uncommon for extended warranties to have limited refund policies.
victim
north hampton,#3Author of original report
Sun, January 29, 2012
I think you missed the point and I am not making things up.............MB has not produced a properly or legally executed copy of the contract and I don't have an executed copy. They have failed to produce the copy or are unable to produce it which nullifies the 60 day rule. Therefore they cannot enforce the rule. I find it hard to believe that any rational person would think that it is OK to rip off a person to the tune of $3602. The fact that MB is taking such a hard line on this issue is symptomatic of a company that values only their bottom line and don't care about their customers who, in most cases, have been loyal to the brand for decades. If you don't work for MB now, you should be.
Flynrider
Phoenix,#4Consumer Comment
Sat, January 28, 2012
" Why won't they produce a copy of the properly executed contact? "
You've got it backwards. You are making the claim that they owe you $3602 pursuant to the contract. Can you produce a contract that says they'll refund you over 2 1/2 years later? If you can, you've got a slam dunk case. If you can't, you're just making up contract terms that don't exist. Which is it?