Lawdawg44
Ocala,#2Consumer Suggestion
Fri, April 04, 2008
I am familiar with this development by the bed and breakfast inn you speak of and heard similar situations. In my 34 years of experience this must be a new record for the underhanded sale award. I have assisted in many a prosecution of such cases and I have no doubt the State or HUD will make an example of those whom you did business, but you need to contact them. There are laws regulating subdivision of land in Florida and an attorney should not have a problem assisting with your case.
Fl_landscam.victims
Hampton,#3Author of original report
Fri, March 14, 2008
The lot subject of the above complaint is lot large enough to sustain a required septic system, or any known-recorded architect's design for a house that has ever been published, and the restrictions were not disclosed to the buyers as required by State & Federal law (see contract). The maximum dimensions squared along the street that can be developed are 40'ft. x 40'ft. (as per survey), which is less than 2% of the total lot size (2.2 football fields end to end along the street). Buyers were emphatically told the entire lot could be cleared without restrictions. Additionally, this lot was permitted as a Drainage Easement/Jurisdictional Wetland (not a home-site) that was specifically required by SRWMD in Exhibit E of subdivision permit & HOA contract not to be conveyed/deeded outside of the homeowners association. This is not the only lot in violation of the subdivision's permit, however the lakefront lots were permitted, and are fine.
Emtappling
Starke,#4Consumer Comment
Fri, March 14, 2008
Hello, I own a lake lot in the sub-division that is reported and I just have a few coments about this issue. The land that was discribed in the report has enough room for a 2000 sq. ft. home. The division limt to how small is 1600 sq. ft. I am very happy with my land even though there is a large portion that I can not use. I was very well informed about the area in which I could build my home. He even went as far as to come out there and stake out where I could build my house. As per their advice I also contacted Swannee River Water Mangagement District to make sure I understood it correctly as to where I could build and how much I could clear of the land. I have come to know many of my neighbors in this subdivision that also agree with me. They would not join in the false lawsuit ,after being contacted by this man, that is going on as they were also very well informed in how their land could be used. It seems to me that if Wayne Douglas and Stephen Smith were crooks that they would have tried "swindling", as this man claims, in the lots that were valued at $100,000 verus this little $25,000 lot. I looked a the very property that is mentioned and I would be very happy to purchase this land if I had the means to do so. I also know Stephen F. Smith to be a model citizen, family man and the type of christian that ,anyone who believes, should strive to be like. He does drive a van with signs about the bible. I want whom ever reads this to understand that facts should come from both sides of the accusation. Wayne Douglas is an outstanding Realtor and father as well. If you look at his record of dealings in a 30 year time period, he has not one dispute other than this one. He gave up to great extents to help his son in his endevors. Financially and physically. The way these men are described in the report made are not true at all. I purchased my current home from Mr. Douglas and I strongly recomend anyone looking to buy a home to seek him for advise. Please be fair and listen to both sides. I do not have a qurrel with the family that is feeling that they were ripped off, I do not ever know their names. I just want information about the two men and the property, to have good reports as well as bad and let who deals with these people decide for themselves weither or not they are "crooks". I do like the service you provide with this website. You may help many people from being scamed. Just make sure you have good facts as well as negitive.