Craig
Guntersville,#2REBUTTAL Owner of company
Thu, October 21, 2010
I AM THE OWNER OF THIS WELL LIKED BUSINESS AND THIS IS THE FIRST TIME ANYTHING LIKE THIS HAS HAPPENED, THIS GROOM, NOT BRIDE AS STATED, HAD WANTED ME TO PUT SOME BOGUSS INFORMAL PICTURES IN THE FRONT OF THE FINISHED ALBUM AND OUR LAB HAD STATED BECAUSE OF COPYRIGHT LAWS WE COULD NOT DO THIS, WHEN I EMAILED BILL AND ASHLEY OR ALABAMA BRIDE THAT I COULD NOT USE THEIR PICTURES HE WENT BALISTIC AND FILED THIS FALSE INFORMATION, THE EYES WERE NOT CLOSED ON COVER PROPOSEL, HE MADE FALSE COMMENTS AS TO THE ALBUM IN MENTION AND HE WAS THE ONE WHO SELECTED AND PICKED (PICTURE SELECTION GUIDE) SEVERAL PICTURES JUST ALIKE WHICH WE HAVE KEPT FOR OUR LAW SUIT WITH HIS SLANDEROUS ACTIONS. HE PICKED EVERY PICTURE AND WE HAVE THE PROOF, THEN WANTED TO ADD THOSE UGLY PHOTO'S. I AM SORRY, WE HAD A REPUTATION OF QUALITY TO UPHOLD. I WAS VERY NICE TO HIM THE WHOLE TIME UNTIL ONE OF OUR CUSTOMERS WHO LOVES US, TOLD US OF THE SLADEROUS ACTION HE TOOK. I PROMISE AND HAVE PROOF, WE ARE ONE OF THE BEST AND MOST CURTEOUS WEDDING PHOTOGRAPHERS ANYWHERE IN NORTH ALABAMA. WE CAN FURNISH REFRENCES
Alabama bride
Tuscaloosa,#3Author of original report
Sat, October 17, 2009
Received our photo albums yesterday. They look much better than the proofs from June. The Lecroy's addressed my concerns in the final album. I redact my previous opinions.
Alabama bride
Tuscaloosa,#4Author of original report
Sun, June 07, 2009
Ok, actually counted this time. We received 439 proofs. By my count the number of unique photos (those that are not of the same pose) we received was 225. They have agreed to change the cover photo, because they remember discussing the photo we wanted, but didn't write the number down at the time.