Antony
Wheld,#2Consumer Suggestion
Wed, February 09, 2005
...he's one of many who decided to quit because their income was affected by the changes. Melaleuca saw that some of the top earners were becoming lazy once they reached a certain income level. No longer training their enrollees or team members. No longer signing up new customers. Not all of the big earners were like this, but those that were ruined it for the rest of them. However, look at it like this, if you're earning good money doing something, and then you're given a pay cut because you stopped doing it, you're going to have complaints. No-one likes to receive less than what they are used to. Changes are necessary in every company to survive. Had this individual and others who decided to quit, stayed with Melaleuca, they'd be on the up and up. I agree that residual income should be just that and should not be taken away from individuals once they have earned it. In fact, when I joined Melaleuca in 2004, I did a lot of research about what I was getting into before deciding to go ahead. The compensation plan still allows for residual income as far as I can see. Yeah, I'd like to know what those changes were too. So come on, let us know!
Antony
Wheld,#3Consumer Suggestion
Wed, February 09, 2005
...he's one of many who decided to quit because their income was affected by the changes. Melaleuca saw that some of the top earners were becoming lazy once they reached a certain income level. No longer training their enrollees or team members. No longer signing up new customers. Not all of the big earners were like this, but those that were ruined it for the rest of them. However, look at it like this, if you're earning good money doing something, and then you're given a pay cut because you stopped doing it, you're going to have complaints. No-one likes to receive less than what they are used to. Changes are necessary in every company to survive. Had this individual and others who decided to quit, stayed with Melaleuca, they'd be on the up and up. I agree that residual income should be just that and should not be taken away from individuals once they have earned it. In fact, when I joined Melaleuca in 2004, I did a lot of research about what I was getting into before deciding to go ahead. The compensation plan still allows for residual income as far as I can see. Yeah, I'd like to know what those changes were too. So come on, let us know!
Antony
Wheld,#4Consumer Suggestion
Wed, February 09, 2005
...he's one of many who decided to quit because their income was affected by the changes. Melaleuca saw that some of the top earners were becoming lazy once they reached a certain income level. No longer training their enrollees or team members. No longer signing up new customers. Not all of the big earners were like this, but those that were ruined it for the rest of them. However, look at it like this, if you're earning good money doing something, and then you're given a pay cut because you stopped doing it, you're going to have complaints. No-one likes to receive less than what they are used to. Changes are necessary in every company to survive. Had this individual and others who decided to quit, stayed with Melaleuca, they'd be on the up and up. I agree that residual income should be just that and should not be taken away from individuals once they have earned it. In fact, when I joined Melaleuca in 2004, I did a lot of research about what I was getting into before deciding to go ahead. The compensation plan still allows for residual income as far as I can see. Yeah, I'd like to know what those changes were too. So come on, let us know!
Antony
Wheld,#5Consumer Suggestion
Wed, February 09, 2005
...he's one of many who decided to quit because their income was affected by the changes. Melaleuca saw that some of the top earners were becoming lazy once they reached a certain income level. No longer training their enrollees or team members. No longer signing up new customers. Not all of the big earners were like this, but those that were ruined it for the rest of them. However, look at it like this, if you're earning good money doing something, and then you're given a pay cut because you stopped doing it, you're going to have complaints. No-one likes to receive less than what they are used to. Changes are necessary in every company to survive. Had this individual and others who decided to quit, stayed with Melaleuca, they'd be on the up and up. I agree that residual income should be just that and should not be taken away from individuals once they have earned it. In fact, when I joined Melaleuca in 2004, I did a lot of research about what I was getting into before deciding to go ahead. The compensation plan still allows for residual income as far as I can see. Yeah, I'd like to know what those changes were too. So come on, let us know!
Bill
Waltham,#6Consumer Comment
Thu, July 29, 2004
Bill I would be very interested in knowing what types of changes were made in 1999 and 2002. Is it the compensation plan? What do you mean by changes. Obviously those changes cannot effect new customers, or can they? Maybe you can elaborate on what you mean. It would probably be beneficial to people out there considering the company.
Bill
Waltham,#7Consumer Comment
Thu, July 29, 2004
Bill I would be very interested in knowing what types of changes were made in 1999 and 2002. Is it the compensation plan? What do you mean by changes. Obviously those changes cannot effect new customers, or can they? Maybe you can elaborate on what you mean. It would probably be beneficial to people out there considering the company.
Bill
Waltham,#8Consumer Comment
Thu, July 29, 2004
Bill I would be very interested in knowing what types of changes were made in 1999 and 2002. Is it the compensation plan? What do you mean by changes. Obviously those changes cannot effect new customers, or can they? Maybe you can elaborate on what you mean. It would probably be beneficial to people out there considering the company.
Bill
Waltham,#9Consumer Comment
Thu, July 29, 2004
Bill I would be very interested in knowing what types of changes were made in 1999 and 2002. Is it the compensation plan? What do you mean by changes. Obviously those changes cannot effect new customers, or can they? Maybe you can elaborate on what you mean. It would probably be beneficial to people out there considering the company.